4.6 Article

Molecular Interactions Leading to the Coadsorption of Surfactant Dodecyltrimethylammonium Bromide and Poly(styrenesulfonate) at the Oil/Water Interface

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 35, 期 22, 页码 7268-7276

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00873

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Condensed Phase and Interfacial Molecular Science Division [DE-SC0014278]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0014278] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The strong synergistic adsorption of mixed polymer/surfactant (P/S) systems at the oil/water interface shows promise for applications such as oil remediation and emulsion stabilization, especially with respect to the formation of tunable mesoscopic multilayers. There is some evidence that a combination of dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) and sodium poly(styrenesulfonate) (PSS) exhibits the adsorption of a secondary P/S layer, though the structure of this layer has long eluded researchers. The focus of this study is to determine whether the DTAB-assisted adsorption of PSS at the oil/water interface occurs as a single layer or with subsequent multilayers. The study presented uses vibrational sum-frequency spectroscopy and interfacial tensiometry to determine the degree of PSS adsorption and orientation of its charged groups relative to the interface at three representative concentrations of DTAB. At low and intermediate DTAB concentrations, a single mixed DTAB/PSS monolayer adsorbs at the oil/water interface. No PSS adsorbs above the system critical micelle concentration. The interfacial charge is found to be similar to that of P/S complexes solvated in the aqueous solution. The surface adsorbate and P/S complexes in the bulk both exhibit a charge inversion at around the same DTAB concentration. This study demonstrates the importance of techniques which can differentiate between coadsorbing species and calls into question current models of P/S adsorption at an oil/water interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据