4.2 Article

Influence of Grain Size on Sediment Transport during Initial Stages of Horizontal Dam Break-Type Flows

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000510

关键词

Dam-break flow; Grain size; Sediment transport; Sheet flow; Unsteady flow

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. Australian Research Council [DP110101176, DP140101302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of grain size on sediment transport during the initial stages of dam break-type flows over horizontal mobile sediment beds was investigated through dimensional analysis and experiments. A new dimensional analysis reconciles the unbalanced dimensions in Bagnold's formulations describing the grain size influence on steady-flow sediment transport and indicates that the sediment transport is inversely proportional to the square root of the grain size, consistent with Bagnold's empirical correlation. Total transport rates were measured for quartz grains ranging from 0.22 to 2.65 mm in diameter. Regression between the dimensionless variables indicated that the mobility number collapses the sediment transport data better than the Shields number and indicated that the total sediment transport is approximately inversely proportional to the square root of the grain size and the velocity to the fourth power. The Meyer-Peter Muller transport model based on the Shields number requires transport coefficients for the finest sand that are significantly larger than the conventional values suggested in the literature, between 30 for k(s) = 2.5D(50) and 40 for k(s) = D-50. The values for other sediment sizes are closer to conventional values, within the usual range of 10-12 for k(s) = 2.5D(50), but somewhat higher at 16-22 for k(s) = D-50. The occurrence of sheet flow in a suspension regime appears possible, which may explain the significantly larger transport coefficients required for the finest grain size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据