4.4 Article

Fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations and dysbiosis in dogs with chronic enteropathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1608-1618

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15520

关键词

canine chronic enteropathy; dysbiosis; fecal metabolites; short-chain fatty acids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Accumulating evidence shows an important relationship between the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and host health. Microbial metabolites are believed to play a critical role in host-microbial interactions. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are major end products of bacterial carbohydrate fermentation in the intestinal tract. Decreased concentrations of SCFAs have been observed in humans with GI disease. However, large-scale clinical data in dogs are lacking. Hypothesis/Objective To evaluate fecal concentrations of SCFAs and the fecal microbiota in healthy control (HC) dogs and dogs with chronic enteropathy (CE). Animals Forty-nine privately owned HC dogs and 73 dogs with CE. Methods Prospective cohort study. Fecal concentrations of SCFAs were measured using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Illumina sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were utilized to evaluate the fecal microbiota. Results Fecal concentrations (median [range] mu mol/g of dry matter) of acetate were lower (P = .03) in dogs with CE (185.8 [20.1-1042.1]) than in HC dogs (224.0 [87.7-672.8]). Propionate were also lower (P < .001) in dogs with CE (46.4 [0.4-227.9]) than in HC dogs (105.9 [1.6-266.9]). Moreover, total SCFAs were lower (P = .005) in dogs with CE (268.1 [21.8-1378.2]) than in HC dogs (377.2 [126.6-927.0]). Dysbiosis in dogs with CE was characterized by decreased bacterial diversity and richness, distinct microbial community clustering compared with that in HC dogs, and a higher dysbiosis index. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Dogs with CE had an altered fecal SCFA concentration accompanied by significant changes of the fecal microbiota.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据