4.5 Review

Natural fiber-reinforced composites: A review on material, manufacturing, and machinability

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0892705719844546

关键词

Natural fibers; natural fiber– reinforced composites; manufacturing; drilling; machinability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interest in NFRCs is rapidly increasing due to their advantages, but large-scale use still presents challenges. This article reviews various aspects of NFRCs, focusing on manufacturing and machinability, discussing challenges, damages, key parameters, and research perspectives.
Interest in natural fiber-reinforced composites (NFRCs) is increasing rapidly thanks to their numerous advantages such as low cost, biodegradability, eco-friendly nature, relatively good mechanical properties, and a growing emphasis on the environmental and sustainability aspects of engineering materials. However, large-scale use of NFRCs is still considered as challenging due to the difficulties in manufacturing, limited knowledge of its machinability and appropriate parameter settings, and being prone to machining-induced defects. This article presents a comprehensive review on various aspects of NFRCs, with a focus on the manufacturing and machinability. It covers some recent works related to NFRCs, including the manufacturing processes and parameters, characterization of mechanical properties, applications, and machinability and machining process monitoring, many for the first time. The main challenges associated with machining of NFRCs and the induced damages are outlined, with special attention paid to the effect of physical properties of the fibers and manufacturing process on the machinability, along with the essential machining parameters that affect the quality of the machined surface. The research perspectives and the current application status are also discussed. The article is intended to help readers attain a fundamental understanding of key technologies and the state of the arts in this research area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据