4.1 Review

Tumour-derived exosomes: Tinyenvelopesfor big stories

期刊

BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 107, 期 9, 页码 287-305

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/boc.201400095

关键词

Biomarker; Exosomes; Extracellular vesicles; Horizontal transfer; miRNA

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [GR3728/2-1]
  2. Daimler and Benz Foundation
  3. Verein zur Forderung von Wissenschaft und Forschung an der Medizinischen Fakultat der LMU Munchen (WiFoMed)
  4. LMU Munich's Institutional Strategy LMUexcellent within the framework of the German Excellence Initiative
  5. Reinhard Frank Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of exosomes, which are small, 30-100nm sized extracellular vesicles that are released by virtual all cells, has initiated a rapidly expanding and vibrant research field. Current investigations are mainly directed toward the role of exosomes in intercellular communication and their potential value as biomarkers for a broad set of diseases. By horizontal transfer of molecular information such as micro RNAs, messenger RNAs or proteins, as well as by receptor-cell interactions, exosomes are capable to mediate the reprogramming of surrounding cells. Herein, we review how especially cancer cells take advantage of this mechanism to influence their microenvironment in favour of immune escape, therapy resistance, tumour growth and metastasis. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive microarray analysis (n>1970) to study the expression patterns of genes known to be intimately involved in exosome biogenesis across 26 different cancer entities and a normal tissue atlas. Consistent with the elevated production of exosomes observed in cancer patient plasma, we found a significant overexpression especially of RAB27A, CHMP4C and SYTL4 in the corresponding cancer entities as compared to matched normal tissues. Finally, we discuss the immune-modulatory and anti-tumorigenic functions of exosomes as well as innovative approaches to specifically target the exosomal circuits in experimental cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据