4.2 Article

Application of a new sample preparation method based on surfactant-assisted dispersive micro solid phase extraction coupled with ultrasonic power for easy and fast simultaneous preconcentration of toluene and xylene biomarkers from human urine samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE IRANIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 1131-1138

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13738-018-01588-w

关键词

Hippuric and methyl hippuric acid; Surfactant-assisted dispersive micro solid phase extraction; Box-Behnken design; Human urine samples; High-performance liquid chromatography

资金

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences grant [35971]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fast and easy surfactant-assisted dispersive micro-solid phase extraction method coupled with ultrasonic power was used for the simultaneous preconcentration and determination of low levels of hippuric and methyl hippuric acid in human urine samples. In the first step, magnetic nanoparticles was coated by titanium oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4/TiO2 NPs), afterward characterized by the scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. In the next step, anionic surfactants were thus combined with the synthesized magnetic nanoparticles to create a new adsorbent for increasing the simultaneous extraction of hippuric and methyl hippuric acid. After elution of extracted target molecules by the sorbent, the concentration of these molecules were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-UV). Meanwhile, a statistical approach known as Box-Behnken design was applied for optimizing significant parameters. With the optimum parameters anticipated by the experimental design, the limit of quantification (LOQ) acquired was reported to be 3 mu gL(-1), and the calibration curve was linear within the concentrations of 3-1000 mu gL(-1). Finally, the method was effectively implemented for the determination of low levels of hippuric and methyl hippuric acid in human urine samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据