4.3 Article

Biological Parameters of Argyrotaenia montezumae (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and Influence of the Oviposition Substrate Color on Fecundity

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/saw040

关键词

Argyrotaenia montezumae; life parameter; oviposition substrate color; Rubus sp.

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia-Mexico
  2. Coordinacion de la Investigacion Cientifica
  3. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo
  4. Fundacion Produce Michoacan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The leafroller Argyrotaenia montezumae (Walsingham) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) was found feeding on blackberry leaves (Rubus sp.) in three localities of Michoacan, Mexico, for the first time in 2008. Several biological parameters of this insect were assessed under laboratory conditions (25 +/- 2 degrees C, 75 +/- 5% relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 16:8 [L:D] h). The egg, larval (five instars), prepupal, pupal, and adult stages lasted 7.28, 21.62, 3.89, 8.37, and 17.64 d, respectively. Larval growth of A. montezumae followed Dyar's rule, and the growth ratios for the widths between the genae and the distance between the frontal setae of the head were 1.43 and 1.54, respectively. Female and male pupae weighed 33 and 21 +/- 0.56 mg, respectively. The adult sex ratio (percentage of females) was 48%. When females oviposited on the inner walls of a transparent plastic container, the cumulative number of eggs per female over a lifetime was 391, with preoviposition and oviposition periods of 3.5 and 8.1 d, respectively. Peak oviposition activity was recorded when female age ranged from 4 to 8 d (47.35 and 52.12 eggs per female, respectively). The egg hatching percentage was 92.24%. The influence of the oviposition substrate color on the fecundity of A. montezumae was assessed using high-density polyethylene of different colors. The overall number of eggs per female was higher on green (352.5), blue (327.86), and yellow (250.60) substrates than on transparent (192.22) and pink (197.00) substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据