4.6 Article

Longitudinal atopic dermatitis control and persistence vary with timing of disease onset in children: A cohort study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 81, 期 6, 页码 1292-1299

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.016

关键词

atopic dermatitis; disease control; disease persistence; early onset; eczema; epidemiology; late onset; prognosis

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [T32-AR007465]
  2. Dermatology Foundation Dermatologist Investigator Research Fellowship
  3. Valeant Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Wide variation exists in the timing of atopic dermatitis (AD) disease onset among children. Distinct trajectories of early-onset, mid-onset, and late-onset AD have been previously described. Objective: To evaluate longitudinal disease control and persistence with respect to age at onset of AD. Methods: A cohort study was performed using the Pediatric Eczema Elective Registry, a prospective observational cohort of subjects with childhood-onset AD. AD control and persistence were assessed biannually for up to 10 years. Results: A total of 8015 subjects with 41,934 person-years of follow-up were included. In longitudinal analyses using generalized linear latent and mixed modeling, older age at onset of AD was associated with better disease control and less-persistent AD. For each additional year of age at onset of AD, the adjusted odds ratios for poorer AD control and for persistent AD were 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-0.94) and 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.88), respectively. Differences in AD control and persistence among subjects with early-, mid-, and late-onset AD were most pronounced from early adolescence onward. Limitations: Misclassification bias may arise from using self-reported data on age at onset. Attrition and missing data in longitudinal studies may introduce bias. Conclusion: Early-, mid-, and late-onset pediatric AD appear to be clinically distinct subtypes of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据