4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Defining Massive Transfusion in Civilian Pediatric Trauma With Traumatic Brain Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 44-50

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.10.053

关键词

Pediatric trauma; Traumatic brain injury; massive transfusion; massive transfusion protocol; Hemorrhage control; Mortality

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify an optimal definition of massive transfusion in civilian pediatric trauma with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) Methods: Severely injured children (age <= 18 y) with severe TBI in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program research data sets 2015-2016 that received blood products were identified. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, and logistic regression. Continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range). Massive transfusion thresholds were determined based on receiver operating curves and optimization of sensitivity and specificity Results: Of the 460 included children, the mortality rate was 43%. There were no differences in demographics, heart rate at presentation, or injury severity score between children that lived or died. However, those who died had lower Glasgow coma scores (3 [3, 8] versus 3 [3, 3]; P < 0.01), were more likely to have had a penetrating injury (20% versus 11%; P < 0.01) and were more likely to be hypotensive for age (62% versus 34%; P < 0.01). Total blood products infused were greater in those who died (34 mL/kg/4-h [17, 65] versus 22 [12, 44]; P < 0.01). Sensitivity and specificity for delayed mortality was optimized at 40 mL/kg/4 h, and for the need for a hemorrhage control procedure at 50 mL/kg/4 h. These thresholds predicted delayed mortality (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.28-3.50; P < 0.01) and the need for hemorrhage control procedures (5.47; 95% CI 2.82- 10.61; P < 0.01) Conclusions: For children with TBI, a massive transfusion threshold of 40 mL/kg/4-h of total administered blood products may be used to identify at-risk patients, improve resource utilization, and guide future research methodology (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据