4.7 Article

A novel underdetermined blind source separation method with noise and unknown source number

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 457, 期 -, 页码 67-91

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.037

关键词

Underdetermined blind source separation; Single source point; Synchrosqueezing transform; Density peaks clustering; l(1)-norm decomposition

资金

  1. Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775407]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61633001]
  3. General Project of Joint Preresearch Fund for Equipment of Ministry of Education [6141A02022121]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been challenging to correctly separate sources from their mixtures with large noise and unknown source number in underdetermined cases. To address this problem, a novel underdetermined blind source separation (UBSS) method is proposed using synchrosqueezing transform (SST) and improved density peaks clustering (DPC). First, SST is employed to reassign time-frequency (TF) coefficients of short time Fourier transform (STFT) of mixed signals from their original position to the center of gravity along frequency direction, contributing to sparser TF representation than STFT. Second, a single source point (SSP) identification method is proposed by directly searching the identical normalized TF vectors, which considers linear representation relations among TF vectors and therefore can identify SSPs more accurately in noisy cases. Third, DPC is improved to automatically identify source number, with which the mixing matrix can be estimated. After that, sources are finally recovered using li-norm decomposition method. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated with some numerical studies and experimental studies. The results show that the proposed method can estimate source number correctly, and recover sources accurately even in noisy cases. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据