4.8 Article

Facile and scalable fabrication of high-energy-density sulfur cathodes for pragmatic lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 104-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.093

关键词

Surface functionalization; Large-scale sulfur cathode; Polar binder; Lithium-sulfur batteries

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [NRF-2016M1B3A1A01937324]
  2. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Institutional Program [2E29650]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2E29650, 2016M1B3A1A01937324] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur battery is garnering much of attention due to its high energy densities, low-cost active material of sulfur and variety of applications in portable electronics. High integrity and consistent qualities of the large-scale sulfur cathode with high energy have to be ensured to construct reliable and practical lithium-sulfur batteries that could supersede advancing lithium-ion batteries. Here, facile and productive approaches are developed to mass-produce functional sulfur hosts and to fabricate large-scale sulfur cathode with high sulfur loading. The functional sulfur host is synthesized by anchoring polyethylenimine at the surface of commercially available carbon at inert conditions with a scale of more than 10 g per batch via simple solution method. Combining the functionalized sulfur host with a polyacrylic acid binder allows high integrity and uniformity of the high sulfur loading cathode to be fabricated in large dimensions. Followed by this approach, the sulfur cathode, 70 x 6 cm(2), is produced with the sulfur loading of > 4.3 mg cm(-2). It is found that 12 wt% of polyethylenimine in the functionalized sulfur host with polyacrylic acid is at optimal condition that presents stable electrochemical performances over 600 cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据