4.6 Article

Capping of silver nanoparticles by anti-inflammatory ligands: Antibacterial activity and superoxide anion generation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.02.005

关键词

Silver nanoparticles; Antibacterial activity; Superoxide anion; XTT

资金

  1. VRID USACH
  2. Fondecyt Anillo [ACT-1412]
  3. Fondecyt Regular [1140226]
  4. Dicyt-Usach [051742PC-DAS]
  5. anillo [ACT-1412]
  6. SMAT-C

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been widely recognized as antibacterial agents. However, its stability and activity over time have been poorly studied. In this work, the properties and characteristics of differently stabilized AgNPs were evaluated during a span of time. The surface capping agents were diclofenac (d), and ketorolac (k), which currently are used as anti-inflammatory in human medicine. On evaluating the size variation over time, it was observed that the AgNPs-k are the most stable, unlike the non-capped nanoparticles agglomerate and precipitate. UV-Vis spectroscopy analysis showed that the absorbance during time decreases for the three types of nanoparticles, but the decrease is less marked for the two types of anti-inflammatory-capped AgNPs. The rapid loss of the optical prop- erties of bare AgNPs, is mainly due to oxidation, agglomeration, and precipitation of this nanoparticles. The potential cytotoxicity of the AgNPs, evaluated through the formation of the superoxide anion using XXT, showed that both, AgNPs-k and AgNPs-d, generate the radical anion when the samples are irradiated with UV light at 365 nm. This effect appears associated with the capping agents, since the bare nanoparticles did not promote the formation of the superoxide anion. The antibacterial activity of the AgNPs throughout time, against two microorganisms (Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus), was also evaluated. The results showed that capping agents played a decisive role in the antibacterial ability of AgNPs and also in enhancing the antibacterial activity over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据