4.5 Article

Mitigation of asphaltenes precipitation phenomenon via chemical inhibitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 495-507

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.071

关键词

Asphaltenes precipitation; Inhibitors; Downhole; Solid detection system (SDS)

资金

  1. Kuwait Oil Company (KOC)
  2. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main aim of this study is to mitigate asphaltenes precipitation phenomenon using chemical inhibitors under reservoir conditions. Different conventional screening test methods such as UV-Vis and solids detection system (SDS) equipped with a low-intensity near infrared (NIR) light and a high-pressure microscope (HPM) were used to assess the effectiveness of asphaltenes inhibitors on a stock tank oil (STO) and downhole samples (DHS). These tests have been employed as part of a rigorous investigation to understand (evaluate) the performance of chemical inhibitors in mitigating asphaltene precipitation and deposition. The extracted asphaltenes were characterized by higher aromaticity due to relatively low hydrogen/carbon molar ratios, hence, the higher tendency of asphaltenes aggregation and subsequent precipitation upon changes in thermodynamic factors. Moreover, the evaluation tests of the commercial asphaltenes inhibitors showed efficient asphaltenes dispersion performance when tested by using different conventional methods. Finally, the high-pressure microscope tests conducted on the DHS at reservoir temperature showed that the most efficient inhibitors reduced the aggregated asphaltenes average particles size by 58%. This is attributed to the presence of the high aromatic content, and polar acidic and/or alcoholic functionalities in the molecular structures of those inhibitors, which is vital for the dispersion of the asphaltenes and the prevention of the formation of large asphaltenes aggregates through pi-pi interactions and van der Waals forces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据