4.5 Article

Predicting Physicians' Intentions to Recommend Medical Cannabis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 400-407

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.05.010

关键词

Medical cannabis; clinical practices; physicians' intentions

资金

  1. Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research [188/14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Although medical cannabis (MC) policies continue to evolve around the world, the integration of MC into clinical practice remains highly debated within the medical community. Objectives. Relying on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study aim was to identify underlying factors that influence physicians' intentions to recommend MC to patients and to examine whether there are differences in the strength of these associations across three medical specialties (family medicine, oncology, and pain medicine). Methods. 247 physicians completed questionnaires including measures of TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control) and intentions to recommend MC to two clinical vignettes describing medical background of a cancer and a chronic pain patient. Regression models were used to measure the extent to which perceived knowledge and TPB constructs predict physicians' intentions to recommend MC. Results. Physicians' intentions to recommend MC to the cancer patient vignette was higher than their intentions to recommend to the chronic pain patient vignette. Intentions to recommend MC to the patient with cancer were associated with more favorable attitudes toward MC, whereas intentions to recommend MC to the patient with chronic pain were associated with more favorable attitudes, higher levels of perceived control, and lower levels of perceived knowledge. Conclusion. Clinical practices related to MC may be influenced by nonmedical factors, and this may be particularly prevailing in the field of chronic pain, suggesting that MC may be particularly contentious in this field. (C) 2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据