4.1 Article

Ecological Momentary Assessment of the Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner Family Meal Environment in Racially/Ethnically Diverse and Immigrant Households

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 658-676

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.03.002

关键词

Ecological Momentary Assessment; family meals; mixed methods; parenting practices; qualitative

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL126171, R03HD084897]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe meal characteristics across breakfast, lunch, and dinner family meals in racially/ethnically diverse and immigrant/refugee households via ecological momentary assessment; identify real-time meal characteristics associated with family meal frequency; and identify qualitative themes regarding parents' perspectives about meal characteristics and meal types that influence family meal frequency. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: In-home visits. Participants: Children aged 5-7 years (n = 150) and their families from diverse and low-income households. Main Outcome Measure(s): Mixed methods. Analysis: Multiple linear regression and hybrid deductive and inductive content analysis. Results: Quantitative results indicated several similar meal characteristics occurring across weekdays and weekend days and by meal type (eg, parent prepared the meal, food mostly homemade, meal eaten at table) and some significant negative associations (P < .05) between meal characteristics and family meal frequency (eg, fast food for family meals). Eight main qualitative themes with several subthemes supported and expanded the quantitative findings and added depth to interpretation of the findings. Conclusions and Implications: Results identified specific meal characteristics both quantitatively and qualitatively that may inform the development of interventions to increase the frequency of family meals so that more families can benefit from the protective nature of family meals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据