4.6 Article

Several salicylatocopper(II) complexes with diethylnicotinamide: Preparation, structure, spectral properties and Hirshfeld surface analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1181, 期 -, 页码 373-382

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.12.066

关键词

Cu(II) complexes; Salicylate anion; Supramolecular structure; Hirshfeld surface analysis; EPR spectroscopy

资金

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-15-0053, APVV-16-0039]
  2. Scientific Grant Agency Slovak Republic [VEGA 1/0639/18, VEGA 1/0686/17, VEGA 1/0026/18]
  3. MSVVaS of the Slovak Republic within the Research and Development Operation Programme [26240220084]
  4. Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The little change of the reaction conditions led to formation four monomeric copper (II) complexes of different hydrate formula [Cu(XSal)(2)(dena)(2)(H2O)(x)] (where x = 0 for XSal = 3,5-dichlorosalicylate; x = 1 for XSal = 5-methylsalicylate or x = 2 for XSal = 4-chlorosalicylate resp. 3,5-dichlorosalicylate; dena = N,N-diethylnicotinamide) and two anhydrous polymeric complexes [Cu(XSal)(2)(dena)(2)](n) (where XSal = 5-bromosalicylate or XSal = 4-methoxysalicylate). The monomeric complexes build up 1D chains and/or 2D supramolecular network. The polymeric ones constitute 1D coordination polymers. The intermolecular interactions were studied by Hirshfeld surface analysis. Four different coordination modes of anion were observed in compounds and they are in good relation to their spectral information. The EPR spectra of all the complexes were measured at room temperature. The g-factor values evaluated from the axially symmetric Cu(II) EPR spectra fulfilled an usual relation of g(//) >g perpendicular to> 2.0023, which is consistent with d(x)(2)-(2)(y) ground electronic state and which indicates the coordination sphere of the distorted tetragonal symmetry for copper (II) ions. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据