4.5 Article

Assessment of the properties of chitin deacetylases showing different enzymatic action patterns

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2019.01.002

关键词

Chitin deacetylases; Deacetylation pattern; Structure comparison; Physiochemical properties; Molecular docking; Catalytic cavities

资金

  1. Biotechnological tools implementation for new wound healing applications of byproducts from crustacean seafood processing industry (ChitoWound) [PN3-P3-284]
  2. grant 'Cercetare de excelenta in UVT prin sustinerea si dezvoltarea centrelor de cercetare ale universitatii'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitin deacetylases are a group of enzymes catalysing the conversion of chitin to chitosan. Obtaining chitosan with established deacetylation degree and pattern is important for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Understandings of the structural properties of chitin deacetylases and the specificity of their interactions with chitin may conduct to the control of the pattern of deacetylation of chitosan. Our study is focused on the characterization and comparison of the structural and physicochemical properties of chitin deacetylases from fungi and marine bacteria. Despite the low sequences identity for the investigated chitin deacetylases, there are amino acids belonging to their active sites that are strongly conserved. Moreover, they reveal an increased structural similarity of their catalytic domains, reflecting the common biological function of these enzymes. The studied enzymes present dissimilar local physicochemical properties of their catalytic cavities that could be responsible of their distinct deacetylation patterns. Molecular docking studies reflect that deacetylation efficiency is also distinct for the chitin and partially deacetylated chitin oligomers and that N-acetylglucosamine units and some partially deacetylated chitin oligomers could have inhibitory effect against chitin deacetylases belonging to fungi and marine bacteria. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据