4.2 Article

Diagnostic accuracy of interleukin-6 for early-onset sepsis in preterm neonates

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1606194

关键词

Cytokines; early neonatal period; interleukin-6; neonatal sepsis; preterm neonates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combining IL-6 with other perinatal factors can significantly increase the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of EOS in preterm neonates, although there is a tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity which affects overall diagnostic accuracy. These findings may be valuable for individual decision making.
Background: Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among neonates. Yet, accurate diagnosis remains a major challenge in clinical routine. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in combination with other objective perinatal data for early-onset sepsis (EOS) in preterm neonates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective nested case-control study with preterm neonates with a birth weight < 2000 g born in our NICU between January 2007 and June 2016. Differences of IL-6 levels and other perinatal clinical and laboratory data between neonates with and without EOS were statistically analyzed. Results: Sixty-seven preterm infants with and 115 neonates without EOS were included in this study. Specificity and sensitivity for IL-6 were 72.8% and 75.0%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.804 at a cut-off point of 40 ng/l. Depending on the statistical method applied, combining IL-6 with a second perinatal factor led either to an increase of specificity (82.4-100%) or sensitivity (75.0-92.2%). Conclusion: The combination of IL-6 with other perinatal factors can significantly increase specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of EOS. However, overall diagnostic accuracy cannot be notably improved as there is a tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. Although these findings do not necessarily apply in clinical routine, they can be of substantial value in the assistance of individual decision making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据