4.6 Article

Understanding Relative Importance of Barriers to Improving the Customer-Supplier Relationship within Construction Supply Chains Using DEMATEL Technique

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000680

关键词

Construction industry; Collaboration; Construction supply chain; Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction industry is lagging behind other industries in terms of efficiency and performance. Lean-oriented supply chain management (SCM) initiatives have not yet led to significant improvements because of the peculiarities of the industry. In this regard, the construction industry is characterized by poor collaboration, conflicts, disputes, and a lack of customer focus and end-user involvement. These peculiarities make partnering in construction industry projects somewhat difficult. Practitioners, researchers, and societies at large have, therefore, called for a change in attitudes, behaviors, and procedures to increase the chances of a project's success. First, this study performed a systematic literature review followed by eight structured interviews to understand the most important barriers that prevent the collaboration in customer-supplier relationships in construction supply chains. Second, the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) analysis provided a new understanding of the barriers by showing cause-effect associations among them to promote collaboration in the construction industry's SCM. This new understanding can be used to orient more effective actions to improve the customer-supplier relationship in the construction supply chain. The main findings show that three of the four barriers that act as causes are industry-related barriers, and the main finding depends on the specific temporary configuration that characterizes a project-based industry. Among the causes, there is also an organizational barrier that highlights how a clear definition of a project's roles and responsibilities impacts collaboration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据