4.5 Article

First-principles calculations of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the prototype 2:17 cell boundary phase Y(Co1-x-yFexCuy)5

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
卷 477, 期 -, 页码 147-155

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.061

关键词

Permanent magnets; Doping; Coercivity; Coherent potential approximation

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M028941/1]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [15K13525]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K13525] Funding Source: KAKEN
  4. EPSRC [EP/M028941/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a computational study of the compound Y(Co1-x-yFexCuy)(5) for 0 <= x, y <= 0.2. This compound was chosen as a prototype for investigating the cell boundary phase believed to play a key role in establishing the high coercivity of commercial Sm-Co 2:17 magnets. Using density-functional theory, we have calculated the magnetization and magnetocrystalline anisotropy at zero temperature for a range of compositions, modeling the doped compounds within the coherent potential approximation. We have also performed finite temperature calculations for YCo5, Y(Co0.838Cu0.162)(5) and Y(Co0.838Fe0.081Cu0.081)(5) within the disordered local moment picture. Our calculations find that substituting Co with small amounts of either Fe or Cu boosts the magnetocrystalline anisotropy K, but the change in K depends strongly on the location of the dopants. Furthermore, the calculations do not show a particularly large difference between the magnetic properties of Cu-rich Y(Co0.838Cu0.162)(5) and equal Fe-Cu Y(Co0.838Fe0.081Cu0.081)(5), despite these two compositions showing different coercivity behavior when found in the cell boundary phase of 2:17 magnets. Our study lays the groundwork for studying the rare earth contribution to the anisotropy of Sm(Co1-x-yFexCuy)(5), and also shows how a small amount of transition metal substitution can boost the anisotropy field of YCo5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据