4.5 Article

Frontline Science: Concanavalin A-induced acute hepatitis is attenuated in vitamin D receptor knockout mice with decreased immune cell function

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 106, 期 4, 页码 791-801

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/JLB.3HI0219-048R

关键词

Kupffer cells; neutrophils; innate immunity; reactive oxygen species; phagocytosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a nuclear receptor for the active form of vitamin D, 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3, and regulates various physiologic processes, such as bone and calcium metabolism, cellular proliferation and differentiation, and immunity. VDR is highly expressed in the intestine, kidney, bone, and macrophages, but is expressed at a low level in the liver. The liver is a major metabolic organ and also acts as an immune gateway for dietary nutrients and xenobiotics. In this study, we investigated the function of VDR in hepatic immune cells, such as Kupffer cells/macrophages, utilizing VDR knockout (KO) mice. We showed that VDR is functionally expressed in hepatic mononuclear cells, specifically resident Kupffer cells. We examined the role of VDR in acute hepatitis induced by concanavalin A (Con-A) and found that Con-A-induced hepatitis is attenuated in VDR-KO mice compared to wild-type (WT) mice. Con-A-induced hepatitis is known to be mediated by NKT cell activation, cytokine production, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in Kupffer cells/macrophages. However, the proportions of Kupffer cells/macrophages and the NKT cell activation were similar in the liver of WT and VDR-KO mice and inflammatory cytokine gene expression was increased in VDR-KO mice. On the other hand, plasma and hepatic ROS levels were decreased in the liver of VDR-KO mice compared to WT mice. The phagocytic activity of resident Kupffer cells and hepatic neutrophils were also decreased in VDR-KO mice. Therefore, VDR is necessary for Con-A-induced acute hepatitis and plays an important role in hepatic immune cell functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据