4.2 Article

Usefulness of the blood pressure classification in the new 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines for the prediction of new-onset chronic kidney disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 873-878

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41371-019-0198-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to determine whether the blood pressure (BP) classification recommended in the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines is useful for the prediction of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in adults. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using annual health check data in Iki City, Nagasaki, Japan. A total of 3269 adults without CKD, who were not on BP-lowering medication, were included in the present analysis. BP was classified as: normal (systolic BP (SBP) <120 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) <80 mmHg), elevated BP (120 <= SBP < 130 and/or DBP < 80), stage 1 hypertension (130 <= SBP < 140 and/or 80 <= DBP < 90), and stage 2 hypertension (SBP >= 140 mmHg and/or DBP >= 90 mmHg). The primary outcome of the study was new-onset CKD. The effects of BP on the development of CKD were evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards modelling. During a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 472 (14.4%) participants developed CKD. The incidence (per 1000 person-years) of new-onset CKD was higher in individuals with elevated BP. After adjustment for other risk factors, there were significant associations between elevated BP and new-onset CKD: hazard ratio 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.42) in elevated BP, 1.25 (1.01-1.54) in stage 1 hypertension, and 1.45 (1.18-1.79) in stage 2 hypertension, compared with the reference group with normal BP (P < 0.001 for trend). Thus, the findings of this study confirm the definition of hypertension (>= 130/80 mmHg) recommended by the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of hypertension to be useful for the prediction of new-onset CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据