4.7 Article

Post-functionalization of UiO-66-NH2 by 2,5-Dimercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole for the high efficient removal of Hg(II) in water

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 368, 期 -, 页码 42-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.025

关键词

Post-functionalization; UiO-66-NH2; Mercury ions; Reusability; Selective adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51664037, U1702252and51572202]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171234]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new MOFs adsorbent was prepared by post-functionalization of UiO-66-NH2 with 2,5-Dimercapto-1,3,4thiadiazole and utilized to remove the Hg(II) in water selectively. The UiO-66-types were detected by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), BrunauerEmmett-Teller (BET) and zeta potential instruments. The adsorption properties of the new MOFs adsorbent were investigated by batch experiments. The actual maximum adsorption amount was 670.5 mg/g at the optimal pH of 3. Adsorption kinetic and isotherm models were exceedingly fitted to pseudo-second-order and Langmuir/ Dubinin-Radushkevich, respectively. The adsorption process and mode were geared to monolayer and chemisorption, the removal rate was directly proportional to the square of mercury ions concentration. The UiO-66DMTD adsorbent was easy to be regenerated and the removal rate decreased by only 13.5% after ten consecutive cycles. The results of FTIR, XRD and XPS suggested that the adsorption mechanism lay on the complexation reaction between Hg(II) and thiol/nitrogen-containing groups. Moreover, compared with other competitive metal ions, viz., Zn(II), Co(IV), Ni(II), Cd(II), Mg(II), Fe(III), Ca(II) and Cu(II), the UiO-66-DMTD demonstrated an outstanding selective adsorption for Hg(II). These results manifested that the UiO-66-DMTD was a latent adsorbent for the efficient and selective removal of Hg(II) in wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据