4.0 Article

Preliminary Evaluation of Functional Swallow After Total Laryngectomy Using High-Resolution Manometry

期刊

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
卷 125, 期 7, 页码 541-549

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0003489416629978

关键词

laryngectomy; high-resolution manometry; pharyngeal swallow

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health grant from the National Institute on Deafness and other Communicative Disorders [R33 DC011130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Understanding of swallowing pressures after total laryngectomy (TL) and what constitutes a functional swallow are limited. Mobile structures are altered or removed after TL, with consequent effects on pressure profiles. High-resolution manometry (HRM) can characterize these pressures. Methods: Six TL subjects without dysphagia and 6 controls underwent pharyngeal HRM. Timing and pressure variables for the velopharynx, mesopharynx, and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were compared. Changes in variables due to bolus volume were evaluated in TL subjects. Results: The TL subjects had increased duration of velopharyngeal pressure (P = .012). Maximum mesopharyngeal pressure was lower versus controls (P = .003). Maximal and total pre-opening (P = .002, P = .002) and post-closure (P = .001, P = .002) UES pressures were lower. Maximum mesopharyngeal pressure (P = .032) decreased with increasing bolus volume. Conclusions: Increased velopharyngeal pressure duration and total swallow duration reflect separation of the pharynx into distinct conduits for air and food, thus ensuring successful bolus passage without the need for respiration. Decreased UES pressure highlights the effects of disrupting the cricopharyngeal and rostral esophageal muscle fibers from their attachments to the larynx and performing a cricopharyngeal myotomy. Additional studies including subjects with dysphagia could further characterize the functional TL swallow and identify aspects susceptible to dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据