4.4 Article

Glacier mass balance over the central Nyaincientanglha Range during recent decades derived from remote-sensing data

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 65, 期 251, 页码 422-439

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2019.20

关键词

debris-covered glaciers; glacier delineation; glacier mass balance; remote sensing

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MOST) [2013FY111400]
  2. project of State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science [SKLCS-OP-2019-07]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41190084, 41671057, 41671075, 41701087, 41801031]
  4. International Partnership Programme of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [131C11KYSB20160061]
  5. MOST project [2006FY110200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To obtain information on changes in glacier mass balance in the central Nyaincientanglha Range, a comprehensive study was carried out based on digital-elevation models derived from the 1968 topographic maps, the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission DEM (2000) and TerraSAR-X/ TanDEM-X (2013). Glacier area changes between 1968 and 2016 were derived from topographic maps and Landsat OLI images. This showed the area contained 715 glaciers, with an area of 1713.42 +/- 51.82 km(2), in 2016. Ice cover has been shrinking by 0.68 +/- 0.05% a(-1) since 1968. The glacier area covered by debris accounted for 11.9% of the total and decreased in the SE-NW directions. Using digital elevation model differencing and differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry, a significant mass loss of 0.46 +/- 0.10 m w.e. a(-1) has been recorded since 1968; mass losses accelerated from 0.42 +/- 0.20 m w.e. a(-1) to 0.60 +/- 0.20 m w.e. a(-1) between 1968-2000 and 2000-2013, with thinning noticeably greater on the debris-covered ice than the clean ice. Surface-elevation changes can be influenced by ice cliffs, as well as debris cover and land- or lake-terminating glaciers. Changes showed spatial and temporal heterogeneity and a substantial correlation with climate warming and decreased precipitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据