4.4 Article

Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalisation in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides fed on alternative diets

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 393-400

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13991

关键词

formulated feed; Micropterus salmoides; quantitative real-time PCR; reference gene

资金

  1. This research was supported by grants from the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund,CAFS(NO. 2017HY-ZC04)and from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31001107). Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The partial cDNA sequences of eight reference genes (actb, tuba1, gapdh58, gapdh59, eef1a1, RNA 18 s, pabpc1, ube2I) were cloned from largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. The expression levels of these eight genes were compared in the various tissues (eye, spleen, kidney, gill, muscle, brain, liver, heart, gut and gonad) of M. salmoides fed on forage fish. The results showed that the candidate genes exhibited tissue-specific expression to various degrees and the stability ranking order was eef1a1 > tuba1 > RNA 18 s > pabpc1 > ube2I > actb > gapdh58 > gapdh59 among tissue types. Four candidate genes eef1a1, tuba1, RNA 18 s and actb were used to analyse the stability in liver tissues of largemouth bass between the forage-fish group and the formulated-feed group. The candidate genes also showed some changes in expression levels in the livers, while eef1a1 and tuba1 had the most stable expression in livers of fish fed on alternative diets within 10 candidates. So eef1a1 and tuba1 were recommended as optimal reference gene in quantitative real-time PCR analysis to normalise the expression levels of target genes in tissues and lives of the M. salmoides fed on alternative diets. In livers, the expression levels of gck normalised by eef1a1 and tuba1 showed the significant up-regulation in formulated feed group (P < 0.05) than those in forage-fish group. While sex difference has no significant effects on the expression levels of gck in both groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据