4.5 Article

Plastic changes in brain morphology in relation to learning and environmental enrichment in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 222, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200402

关键词

Brain plasticity; Cognition; Reversal learning; Spatial learning

类别

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet) [2016-03435]
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse) [102 2013.0072]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2016-03435] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the common assumption that the brain is malleable to surrounding conditions mainly during ontogeny, plastic neural changes can occur also in adulthood. One of the driving forces responsible for alterations in brain morphology is increasing environmental complexity that may demand enhanced cognitive abilities (e.g. attention, memory and learning). However, studies looking at the relationship between brain morphology and learning are scarce. Here, we tested the effects of both learning and environmental enrichment on neural plasticity in guppies (Poecilia reticulata), by means of either a reversal-learning test or a spatial-learning test. Given considerable evidence supporting environmentally induced plastic alterations, two separate control groups that were not subjected to any cognitive test were included to account for potential changes induced by the experimental setup alone. We did not find any effect of learning on any of our brain measurements. However, we found strong evidence for an environmental effect, where fish given access to the spatial-learning environment had larger relative brain size and optic tectum size in relation to those exposed to the reversal-learning environment. Our results demonstrate the plasticity of the adult brain to respond adaptively mainly to environmental conditions, providing support for the environmental enhancement theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据