4.5 Article

Functional characterisation of two Δ12-desaturases demonstrates targeted production of linoleic acid as pheromone precursor in Nasonia

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 222, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.201038

关键词

Parasitic wasp; Delta 12-desaturase; Sex pheromone; Biosynthesis; Nasonia vitripennis; Urolepis rufipes

类别

资金

  1. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
  2. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NOW) [865.12.003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insect pheromones are often derived from fatty acid metabolism. Fatty acid desaturases, enzymes introducing double bonds into fatty acids, are crucial for the biosynthesis of these chemical signals. Delta 12-desaturases catalyse the biosynthesis of linoleic acid by introducing a second double bond into oleic acid, but have been identified in only a fewanimal species. Here, we report the functional characterisation of two Delta 12-desaturases, Nvit_ D12a and Nvit_D12b, from the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. We demonstrate that Nvit_D12a is expressed in the rectal vesicle of males where they produce a linoleic acid-derived sex pheromone to attract virgin females. C-13-labelling experiments with Urolepis rufipes, a closely related species belonging to the 'Nasonia group', revealed that females, but not males, are able to synthesise linoleic acid. U. rufipes males produce an isoprenoid sex pheromone in the same gland and do not depend on linoleic acid for pheromone production. This suggests that Delta 12-desaturases are common in the 'Nasonia group', but acquired a specialised function in chemical communication of those species that use linoleic acid as a pheromone precursor. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that insect Delta 12-desaturases have evolved repeatedly from Delta 9-desaturases in different insect taxa. Hence, insects have developed a way to produce linoleic acid independent of the omega desaturase subfamily which harbours all of the eukaryotic Delta 12-desaturases known so far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据