4.1 Article

Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing Among Participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1556264619844851

关键词

attitudes; genetics; research participants; Jackson Heart Study; Framingham Heart Study

资金

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute [R01HG005083]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1650116]
  3. Jackson State University [HHSN268201300049C, HHSN268201300050C]
  4. Tougaloo College [HHSN268201300048C]
  5. University of Mississippi Medical Center from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [HHSN268201300046C, HHSN268201300047C]
  6. National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
  7. NHLBI [N01-HC-25195, HHSN268201500001]
  8. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [ZIAHL006001] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic analysis has become integral to many large cohort studies. However, little is known about longitudinal cohort study participants' attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing. We analyzed data from a survey of participants in the Jackson Heart Study (n = 960), Framingham Heart Study (n = 955), and Framingham Heart Study-Omni Cohort (n = 160). Based on a three-question attitude scale, most participants had positive attitudes toward genetic testing (median score = 4.3-5/5). Participants were also asked to select words to describe their attitudes toward genetics. More respondents endorsed the positive words hopeful (60%-70%), optimistic (44%-64%), enthusiastic (35%-43%), or excited (28%-30%) than the negative words cautious (35%-38%), concerned (25%-55%), worried (6%-13%), pessimistic (2%-5%), or horrified (1%-5%). Characteristics associated with favorable attitudes were greater genetics knowledge, higher subjective numeracy, experience with genetic testing, less frequent religious attendance, and not being employed. These findings demonstrate variation in attitudes even among participants in long-standing cohort studies, indicating a need for ongoing participant engagement and education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据