4.3 Article

Incidence and risk factors of paediatric cystic fibrosis-related diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 874-878

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.04.015

关键词

Cystic fibrosis; Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes; Incidence; Risk factors; Paediatric

资金

  1. Irwin Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a common complication of cystic fibrosis (CF) directly linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Both the incidence of type I and type II diabetes has been shown to increase in the general population. In this study, we investigated the incidence and risk factors of CFRD in a paediatric CF population. Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Canadian CF Registry (CCFR) from 2000 to 2016 for patients ages 10 to 18 years was used to determine the incidence of CFRD. Risk factors for CFRD in the Canadian population were investigated using a nested case-control design. Conditional logistic regression analysis with a 4:1 control: case matching was used. Results: From 2000 to 2016, 2326 patients with CF aged between 10 through 18 years were included in the CCFR, during this time the overall incidence rate of CFRD was 2.1 cases per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval 1.8 to 2.3). Incidence rates were stable in the Canadian cohort over three consecutive time periods 2000-2005, 2006-2010; 2011-2016. Worse lung function, female gender, history of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, Gastrostomy tube insertion and liver disease were statistically significant risk factors for CFRD. Conclusion: The incidence of CFRD in the Canadian paediatric population has been stable over time, in contrast to the rising rates of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the general paediatric population. The risk factor for CFRD in this contemporary population were consistent with previous studies. (C) 2019 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据