4.6 Article

Long-term Clinical Effectiveness of Ustekinumab in Patients with Crohn's Disease Who Failed Biologic Therapies: A National Cohort Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 1401-1409

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz080

关键词

Clinical effectiveness; ustekinumab; real-life cohort; Crohn's disease

资金

  1. FNRS [Belgian National Fund of Scientific Research]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ustekinumab [UST] was recently approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease [CD]. Long-term real-world data are currently scarce for CD patients previously exposed to several biologics. Methods: This is an observational, national, retrospective multicentre study. Patients received intravenous UST similar to 6 mg/kg at baseline, with 90 mg subcutaneously thereafter every 8 weeks. Response and remission rates were assessed at Weeks 8, 16, and 52. Results: Data from 152 patients were analysed. All patients were exposed to at least one anti-TNF alpha agent, with 69.7% were exposed to even two anti-TNF alpha and vedolizumab. After 1 year, 42.1% and 25.7% of patients had experienced clinical response and clinical remission, respectively, and 38.8% and 24.3% had achieved steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively; 38.8% of patients discontinued therapy during the 12 months of follow-up. Colonic location was predictive of clinical response at 1 year, and low body mass index [BMI] at baseline was a negative predictor of clinical remission. Resolution of arthralgia was associated with clinical response over time. De novo arthralgia was reported by 17.9% of patients at Week 8 and 13.5% of patients at Week 52. No impact of UST on arthralgia was observed in patients with concomitant ankylosing spondylitis [n = 17]. Others adverse events were reported in 7.2% of patients. Conclusions: This real-world cohort study confirms the effectiveness of UST in CD patients previously exposed to several biologics. Ustekinumab was well tolerated with respect to adverse events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据