4.5 Review

Prevalence of odontogenic cysts and tumors associated with impacted third molars: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 996-1002

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.026

关键词

Molar; Third; Pathology; Jaw cysts; Jaw neoplasms; Systematic review

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa e Invovacao do Estado de Santa Catarina (FAPESC) [88887.200724/2018-00, 88887.200723/2018-00]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [115274/2018-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to investigate the prevalence of odontogenic cysts and tumors associated with impacted third molars (ITM). Methods: Only studies that performed histopathological diagnosis of lesions were eligible for inclusion. Five main electronic and three grey literature databases were searched. Risk of bias (RoB) of included articles was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Results: From 1,300 studies identified, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies were classified as high, seven as moderate, and two as low RoB. The prevalence of odontogenic cysts and tumors associated with ITM was 5.3% (95% CI: 3.1%-8.1%) of ITM. Odontogenic cysts in particular were found in 4.4% (95% CI: 2.5-6.8%) of the extracted ITM, whilst odontogenic tumors in 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2-0.9%). The dentigerous cyst was mentioned in eleven studies with a pooled prevalence of 2.1% (95% CI: 1.4-3.1%). The odontogenic keratocyst was cited by nine studies and had a prevalence of 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2-0.7%). The radicular cyst was mentioned only in three articles and the pooled prevalence was 4.7% (95% CI: 0.0-19.4%) Conclusion: Odontogenic cysts and tumors were found in 5.3% of ITM extracted. The most common lesions were the radicular cyst, dentigerous cyst, and odontogenic keratocyst. (C) 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据