4.7 Article

Bi-functional nitrogen-doped carbon protective layer on three-dimensional RGO/SnO2 composites with enhanced electron transport and structural stability for high-performance lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 542, 期 -, 页码 81-90

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.126

关键词

Three-dimensional graphene; Tin oxide; Composite; Lithium-ion battery; Anode material

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51772078, 61204078, 21671059, U1304505]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT-17R36]
  3. 111 project [D177007]
  4. Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province [154200510009]
  5. Program for Innovative Research Team and Individuals (in Science and Technology) in University of Henan Province [18IRTSTHNO02, 15HASTIT006, 18HASTIT015]
  6. Science and Technology Research Projects of Henan province [162102210268, 162300410174]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide@SnO2@nitrogen-doped carbon (3DG@SnO2@N-C) composites are designed as high efficiency anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. The SnO2 particle size, surface area and pore size distribution of the 3DG@SnO2@N-C could be simply controlled by altering the GO dosages. The optimized 3DG@SnO2@N-C electrode demonstrates a reversible capacity of 1349.5 mAh g(-1 )after 100 cycles at the current density of 100 mA g(-1). Based on the structural and electrochemical dynamic tests, the bi-functional N-doped carbon coating layer could serve as both conductive channel for electron transport and as buffer layer to alleviate the volume change of embedded SnO2 NPs. In addition, the cross-linked conducting 3DG with porous structure attributes to the reduced electron transport and Li ion diffusion resistances, which finally leads to the enhanced cycling stability and rate performances. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据