4.7 Article

A randomized, double-blind phase II study evaluating cediranib versus cediranib and saracatinib in patients with relapsed metastatic clear-cell renal cancer (COSAK)

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 880-886

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw014

关键词

renal cell carcinoma; tyrosine kinase inhibitor; biomarker; SRC; VEGF

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. AstraZeneca [2009-018014-20]
  3. CaCTUS, Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit
  4. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2015-19-005, 09/91/21] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SRC inhibition may help overcome resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cancer. This hypothesis was tested in a randomized phase II study. Results showed saracatinib (SRC inhibitor) did not increase the efficacy of a VEGF-targeted therapy (cediranib) in this setting. Biomarker analysis did not identify consistent predictive biomarkers.Preclinical work suggests SRC proteins have a role in the development of resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy in metastatic clear-cell renal cancer (mRCC). This hypothesis was tested in this trial using the SRC inhibitor saracatinib and the VEGF inhibitor cediranib. Patients with disease progression after a parts per thousand yen1 VEGF-targeted therapy were eligible to participate in this double-blind, randomized (1:1) phase II study. The study compared the combination cediranib 30 mg once daily (o.d.) and saracatinib 175 mg o.d. (CS) (n = 69) or cediranib 45 mg o.d. and placebo o.d. (C) (n = 69). Archived tissue was used for biomarker analysis [SRC, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), von Hippel-Lindau, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1b and hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha : n = 86]. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1. Between 2010 and 2012, 138 patients were randomized across 16 UK sites. The characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. Partial responses were seen in 13.0% for C and 14.5% for CS (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in PFS [5.4 months (3.6-7.3 months) for C and 3.9 (2.4-5.3 months) for CS; hazard ratio (HR) 1.18 (0.94-1.48)] or overall survival (OS) [14.2 months (11.2-16.8 months) for C and 10.0 (6.7-13.2 months) for CS; HR 1.28 (1.00-1.63)]. There was no significant difference in the frequency of key adverse events, dose reductions or drug discontinuations. None of the biomarkers were prognostic for PFS or OS. FAK overexpression correlated with an OS benefit [HR 2.29 (1.09-4.82), P > 0.05], but not PFS, for CS. Saracatinib did not increase the efficacy of a VEGF-targeted therapy (cediranib) in this setting. Biomarker analysis did not identify consistent predictive biomarkers. NCT00942877.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据