4.7 Article

Effects of mixing and sodium formate on thermophilic in-situ biogas upgrading by H2 addition

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 373-381

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.245

关键词

In-situ biogas upgrading; Continuous mixing; Sodium formate; Acidogenesis; Acetogenesis; Strictly hydrogenotrophic methanogens

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0501405]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21476222, 51478448]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2017423]
  4. Key projects for foreign cooperation of International Cooperation Bureau of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [182344KYSB20170009]
  5. Key Deployment Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFZD-SW-313-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of hydrogen (H-2) injection amount, mixing, and sodium formate on in-situ biogas upgrading performance and microbial community structure were investigated during thermophilic digestion of pig manure in a continuous stirred tank reactor with a working volume of 11.2 L and an organic loading rate of 2.0g volatile solid (VS)/(Ld). Continuous mixing was favorable for in-situ biogas upgrading. The relative methane content and methane yield were maintained at approximately 80% and 269 L/kg VS, respectively, under continuous mixing conditions with an H-2 injection rate of 0.66 ml/(minVileactor) and an 1-12:CO2 ratio of 4:1. The added H-2 inhibited acetate production, but not propionate production, during acidogenesis. Sodium formate was more beneficial for the acetogenesis of propionate degradation and restored system stability. Strictly hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanoculleus, Methanobrevibacter, and Methanobacterium) were dominant in the thermophilic in-situ biogas upgrading system. The syntrophic relationship between syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria (Gelria) and hydrogenotrophic methanogens was weakened after the addition of H-2. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据