4.7 Review

Predicting biochar properties and functions based on feedstock and pyrolysis temperature: A review and data syntheses

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 890-902

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.106

关键词

Biochar; Data synthesis; Meta-analysis; Pyrolysis temperature; Feedstock type

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture(NIFA) of United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) [2016-67020-25275]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biochar has been widely studied as a soil amendment to improve soil properties. When different feedstocks are used to produce biochar under different pyrolysis conditions, the resulting biochar would typically differ in physicochemical properties, which consequently impact the agricultural and environmental performance of biochar in its real-world applications. In this work, based on previously reported data from independent studies, different biochar properties were synthesized as a continuum of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type. Despite the fact that other factors besides pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type might also impact biochar properties, given the same category of feedstock, many critical properties such as biochar yield, pH, cation exchange capacity, specific surface area, ash content, volatile matter content, and elemental composition have been found to well correlate with pyrolysis temperature, showing p-values smaller than 0.05. At the same time, through meta-analyses, the effects of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on the agricultural and environmental impacts of biochar, including nitrogen retention, nitrous oxide emission and crop production, have been evaluated. The study has demonstrated that quantitative approaches such as data syntheses and meta-analyses are potential for revealing predictive relationships that can link biochar production with its properties and performance in real-world applications. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据