4.7 Article

Messenger RNA and protein expression of tumor necrosis factor α and its receptors in human follicular granulosa cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 234, 期 11, 页码 20240-20248

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.28624

关键词

granulosa cell; IVF-ICSI; tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha); TNF-alpha receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the concentration of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and its soluble receptors (sTNFR I and II) in serum and follicular fluid (FF) at the time of oocyte retrieval and to detect expression of TNF-alpha and its receptors by luteinized granulosa cells (GCs). In a cross-sectional study and through an in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) program, 81 women undergoing oocyte retrieval were recruited. Serum and FF were obtained from 81 women. GCs were pooled from 20 patients (from six different days of oocyte retrievals, 5-16 follicles per patient). TNF-alpha and its soluble receptors concentration were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and also their expression by immune cytochemistry and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. The median TNF-alpha concentration in serum was 4.06pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 3.71-6.14) and significantly higher than that in FF with 3.50pg/ml (IQR, 3.05-5.01), p<0.001. The sTNFR I and II levels in serum were lower and higher than FF, respectively. The TNF-alpha levels in serum and FF of good responders were higher than low responders (p=0.017 and 0.021, respectively). TNF-alpha cut-off level for low responders versus good responders was 4.174pg/ml in serum with a pregnancy rate of 25.8% and 40% for below and above of this level, respectively (p=0.19). For FF, the cut-off value was 3.89pg/ml. TNF-alpha and its receptors were expressed by GCs. The presence of TNF-alpha and its soluble receptors in serum and FF and their expression by GCs suggest an important role for this cytokine in ovarian function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据