4.8 Article

CoxNi1-x nanoalloys on N-doped carbon nanofibers: Electronic regulation toward efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 372, 期 -, 页码 277-286

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.03.014

关键词

CO2 reduction; Noble-metal-free electrocatalysts; Nanoalloys; Electronic configuration; Binding energy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773093, 21433002]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2015A030306014]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201707010268]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electronic modulation on catalysts is vital to improve the efficiency of electrochemical CO2 reduction reactions (CO2RR). Herein, CoxNi1-x nanoalloys supported by N-doped carbon nanofibers (CoxNi1-x/N-C NFs) are constructed and regulated via facile electrospinning procedures followed by pyrolysis, to efficiently catalyze CO2 reduction toward CO. The modulated electronic configuration is experimentally and theoretically evidenced in CoxNi1-x along with varied composition and interactions. The d-band center up-shifts with increasing Co in CoxNi1-x nanoalloys, leading to obvious variation in the binding energy of key intermediates (*COOH, *CO and *H, * denotes a surface active site) and the reaction free energy (Delta G). Among the CoxNi1-x the Co0.75Ni0.25 features the lowest Delta G (positive) to generate *COOH and desorb *CO, and the highly negative Delta G*H, indicating the promoted CO2RR but prohibited hydrogen evolution. As expected, the optimal Co0.75Ni0.25/N-C NFs afford a high CO Faradaic efficiency of 85.0% and a current density of -13.4 mA cm(-2) at -0.9 V vs. RHE in 0.5 M NaHCO3, performing at the high-level of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts. Elucidating efficient electrocatalysis over well-tailored alloys, our work will open up new opportunities for exploring high-performance materials used in sustainable energy conversion. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据