4.5 Article

Flow over a ski jumper in flight: Prediction of the aerodynamic force and flight posture with higher lift-to-drag ratio

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 78-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.022

关键词

Ski jumping; Flight posture; Lift-to-drag ratio; Large eddy simulation; Simple geometric model

资金

  1. National Research Foundation through the Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2014M3C1B1033848, KSC-2015-C2-022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large eddy simulations (LESs) are performed to study the flow characteristics around two flight posture models of ski jumping. These models are constructed by three-dimensionally scanning two national team ski jumpers taking flight postures. The drag and lift forces on each component of a ski jumper and skis (head with helmet and goggle, body, arms, legs and skis) and their lift-to-drag ratios are obtained. For the two posture models, the drag forces on the body, legs and skis are larger than those on the arms and head with helmet and goggle, but the lift forces on the body and skis are larger than their drag forces, resulting in high lift-to-drag ratios on the body and skis and low lift-to-drag ratio on the legs. We construct simple geometric models, such as the circular cylinder, sphere and thin rectangular plate, predicting the drag and lift forces on each component of a ski jumper and skis, and validate them with those obtained from LES. Using these geometric models, we perform a parametric study on the position angles of flight posture for higher total lift-to-drag ratio. The flight postures obtained increase the total lift-to-drag ratios by 35% and 21% from those of two base postures, respectively. Finally, LESs are performed for the postures obtained and show the increases in the total lift-to-drag ratios by 21% and 16%, respectively, indicating the adequacy of using the simple geometric models for finding a flight posture of ski jumping having a higher lift-to-drag ratio at low cost. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据