4.6 Article

Myxoma virus M013 protein antagonizes NF-B and inflammasome pathways via distinct structural motifs

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 294, 期 21, 页码 8480-8489

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006040

关键词

poxvirus; inflammasome; innate immunity; NF-kappa B (NF-KB); host-pathogen interaction; ASC-1; immune evasion; myxoma virus; PYRIN domain

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [SFI-12/IA/1239]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI100987]
  3. Arizona State University
  4. Shaler Richardson Professorship Endowment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the repertoire of immunoregulatory proteins encoded by myxoma virus, M013 is a viral homologue of the viral pyrin domain-only protein (vPOP) family. In myeloid cells, M013 protein has been shown to inhibit both the inflammasome and NF-B signaling pathways by direct binding to ASC1 and NF-B1, respectively. In this study, a three-dimensional homology model of the M013 pyrin domain (PYD) was built based on similarities to known PYD structures. A distinctive feature of the deduced surface electrostatic map of the M013 PYD is the presence of a negatively region consisting of numerous aspartate and glutamate residues in close proximity. Single-site mutations of aspartate and glutamate residues reveal their role in interactions with ASC-1. The biological significance of charge complementarity in the M013-ASC-1 interaction was further confirmed by functional assays of caspase-1 activation and subsequent secretion of cytokines. M013 also has a unique 33-residue C-terminal tail that follows the N-terminal PYD, and it is enriched in positively charged residues. Deletion of the tail of M013 significantly inhibited the interactions between M013 and NF-B1, thus compromising the ability of the viral protein to suppress the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These results demonstrate that vPOP M013 exploits distinct structural motifs to regulate both the inflammasome and NF-B pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据