4.5 Article

Historical hybrid zone movement: More pervasive than appreciated

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 1300-1305

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13600

关键词

climate change; competition; enclave; fossil record; genomic footprint; historical biogeography; introgression; linkage disequilibrium; pollen record; species distribution modelling

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie grant [655487]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid zones are established where two divergent populations meet and interbreed, but experience some reproductive isolation. If one population expands its range at the expense of the other, their hybrid zone moves. While hybrid zone movement is generally considered to be uncommon and insignificant, recent studies challenge this idea. The commonality of contemporary hybrid zone movement-with shifts in hybrid zones tracked over years to decennia-cannot be disputed, given the many examples available. Cases of historical hybrid zone movement-covering centuries or millennia of mobility-are accumulating, with movement having been inferred from five lines of evidence: (1) range shifts documented in the fossil/pollen record; (2) distribution dynamics derived from species distribution modelling; (3) enclaves of a displaced population persisting inside the range of an expanding one; (4) a peak of linkage disequilibrium at the leading edge of a moving hybrid zone; and (5) genome-wide genetic traces of a displaced population, left behind in an expanding one. While most of these lines of evidence are not straightforward to interpret and/or broadly applicable, the latter-a genomic footprint of hybrid zone movement-promises to be particularly suitable to determine whether a hybrid zone has been on the move since its inception. I argue that historical hybrid zone movement is likely to be prevalent and deserves wider acknowledgement in historical biogeography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据