4.4 Article

Compromised global embryonic transcriptome associated with advanced maternal age

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01438-5

关键词

Advanced maternal age; Human blastocyst; Transcriptome; Gene expression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo investigate the global transcriptome and associated embryonic molecular networks impacted with advanced maternal age (AMA).MethodsBlastocysts derived from donor oocyte IVF cycles with no male factor infertility (<30years of age) and AMA blastocysts (42years) with no other significant female factor infertility or male factor infertility were collected with informed patient consent. RNA sequencing libraries were prepared using the SMARTer (R) Ultra (R) Low Kit (Clontech Laboratories) and sequenced on the Illumina HiSEQ 4000. Bioinformatics included Ingenuity (R) Pathway Analysis (Qiagen) with ViiA 7 qPCR utilized for gene expression validation (Applied Biosystems).ResultsA total of 2688 significant differentially expressed transcripts were identified to distinguish the AMA blastocysts from young, donor controls. 2551 (95%) of these displayed decreased transcription in the blastocysts from older women. Pathway analysis revealed three altered molecular signaling networks known to be critical for embryo and fetal development: CREBBP, ESR1, and SP1. Validation of genes within these networks confirmed the global decreased transcription observed in AMA blastocysts (P<0.05).ConclusionsA significant, overall decreased global transcriptome was observed in blastocysts from AMA women. The ESR1/SP1/CREBBP pathway, in particular, was found to be a highly significant upstream regulator impacting biological processes that are vital during embryonic patterning and pre-implantation development. These results provide evidence that AMA embryos are compromised on a cell signaling level which can repress the embryo's ability to proliferate and implant, contributing to a deterioration of reproductive outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据