Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes

Background: Whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of radiographic alignment leading to improved patient satisfaction and implant survivorship in the long term has thus far been inconclusive. Methods: We retrospectively compared the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 84 knees that had undergone robot-assisted TKA using ROBODOC vs 79 knees that had undergone conventional TKA. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 129.1 months (range: 108-147 months). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society Score and 36-item Short Form Survey, as well as by assessing the range of motion, operation time, and complications. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by assessing the hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and any radiologic abnormalities such as loosening or osteolysis. Results: There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The prevalence of an outlier for the hip-knee-ankle angle in the robot-assisted group was 10.7%, whereas it was 16.5% in the conventional group (P = .172). The other component alignments (alpha degrees, beta degrees, gamma degrees, delta degrees) revealed a tendency toward a lower rate of outliers in the robot-assisted group, but without statistical significance (P >.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in complications, including revision surgery, between both groups. Conclusion: Robot-assisted TKA does not improve long-term clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with conventional TKA. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.