4.6 Article

Fabrication and characterization of sulfonated polybenzimidazole/sulfonated imidized graphene oxide hybrid membranes for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 136, 期 34, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.47892

关键词

agglomeration; graphene oxide; high temperature fuel cells; imidized graphene oxide; proton exchange membrane; sulfonated polybenzimidazole

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. National Science Foundation of China [21776034, 21476044, 21406031]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0101203]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1663223]
  5. Changjiang Scholars Program [T2012049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sulfonated polybenzimidazole (sPBI)/sulfonated imidized graphene oxide (SIGO) was evaluated to be a potential candidate for high temperature proton exchange membranes fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). Multifunctionalized covalently bonded SIGO is incorporated in sPBI matrix to resolve the drawbacks such as low proton conductivity, poor water uptake, and ion-exchange capacity (IEC) of sPBI polymer, synthesized by direct polycondensation in phosphoric acid for the application of proton exchange membranes. Strong hydrogen bonding among multifunctional groups established a neighborhood of interconnected hydrophobic graphene sheets and organic polymer chains. It provides hydrophobic-hydrophilic phase separation and facile proton hopping architecture. The optimized sPBI/SIGO (15 wt %) revealed 2.45 meq g(-1) IEC; 5.81 mS cm(-1) proton conductivity [120 degrees C and 10% relative humidity (RH)] and 2.45% bound water content. The maximum power density of the sPBI/SIGO-15 membrane was 0.40 W cm(-2) at 160 degrees C (5% RH) and ambient pressure with stoichiometric feed of H-2/air. This recommends that sPBI/SIGO composite membranes are compatible candidate for HT-PEMFCs. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47892.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据