4.7 Article

A fine-grained NbMoTaWVCr refractory high-entropy alloy with ultra-high strength: Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 780, 期 -, 页码 607-617

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.318

关键词

Refractory high-entropy alloy (HEA); Mechanically alloying (MA); Spark plasma sintering (SPS); Laves phase

资金

  1. Guangdong Provincial Foundation of Natural Science [2016A030313483]
  2. Key Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2015A010105011, 2015A020214008]
  3. Science and Technology Research Project of Guangzhou [201505040925029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanically alloyed (MA) NbMoTaWVCr refractory high-entropy alloy (HEA) powders were sintered by spark plasma sintering (SPS) at temperatures of 1400-1700 degrees C. The microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of sintered HEAs were subsequently investigated. During the MA process, only a supersaturated body-centered cubic (BCC) structured solid solution was formed. However, C15 Laves phase (Cr,V)(2)(Ta,Nb) and Ta2VO6 particles were precipitated from the disordered BCC phase during the sintering process at temperatures <= 1500 degrees C. When the sintering temperature increased to 1600 degrees C, the Laves phase was transferred to C14 structure and its volume fraction was dramatically reduced. The plasticity of the refractory HEA was strongly affected by the fraction, size and distribution of Laves phase and oxide particles. The NbMoTaWVCr alloy sintered at 1500 degrees C obtained an excellent combination of yield strength (3416 MPa) and failure plasticity (5.3%) at room temperature. The extraordinary high strength of this HEA could be dominantly attributed to the grain boundary strengthening from the micron-sized BCC phase (1.24 mu m), interstitial solid solution strengthening from O in the matrix and the inherent solid solution strengthening in the multi-principal element NbMoTaWVCr alloy. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据