4.7 Article

The role of boracic polyanion substitution on structure and high voltage electrochemical performance of Ni-Rich cathode materials for lithium ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 805, 期 -, 页码 1288-1296

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.090

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; Ni-rich cathode materials; LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2; Boracic polyanion doping; High voltage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804149, 51764029]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan [2018FD039]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0104000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bottleneck for large-scale application of Nickel-rich layered LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 (NCM) cathode material for lithium-ion batteries is their severe capacity fading, especially at high voltage. Herein, we modify the NCM cathode materials by substituting the boracic polyanion to suppress capacity degradation and improve power performance. The crystal structure, morphology, elemental states and surface elemental composition of the cathode materials are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Compared to the bare NCM, the I-(003)/I-(104) ratio of the B3-NCM sample increases from 1.58 to 1.66, and the cation mixing declines from 4.65% to 3.21%, as known by XRD and Rietveld refinement. The results of electrochemical tests indicate that the B1-NCM exhibit superior rate property at the high current density (131.02 mAh g(-1) at 5 C), and the higher capacity retention (76.07% after 100 cycles at 1 C). Further electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) and galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) demonstrate that boracic polyanion doping decreases impedance value and enhances lithium ion diffusion coefficient. These consequences reveal that the boracic polyanion modified LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 cathode material has better electrochemical performance. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据