4.7 Article

Positive mental health as a predictor of recovery from mental illness

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 227-230

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.065

关键词

Positive mental health; Recovery; Complete state model of mental health; Mental health care reform

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [P01-AG020166]
  2. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Midlife Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: High levels of positive mental health protect individuals from mental illness. This study investigates longitudinal change in positive mental health as a predictor of mental illness recovery in a cohort group. Methods: Using data from the 1995 and 2005 Midlife in the United States cross-sectional surveys (n= 1,723), logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio that individuals diagnosed with a mental illness in 1995 would have recovered in 2005 based on whether their level of positive mental health changed over the 10-year period. Results: Individuals who maintained or gained the highest levels of positive mental health were more than 27.6 and 7.4 times, respectively, more likely to recover when compared to those who maintained the lowest level of positive mental health. Those who maintained or gained moderate levels of positive mental health had more moderate likelihood of recovery, and those whose positive mental health declined to the lowest levels had no significantly different likelihood of recovery compared to participants whose positive mental health remained low. Limitations: This study was limited by the age of the data, and the inability to control for some predictors of recovery. Conclusions: This study suggests that positive mental health may be an important resource for individuals to recover from mental illness and stay mentally healthy. Results point to the need to include positive mental health assessment and interventions into mental health care systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据