4.2 Article

CD19+CD21low B Cells and CD4+CD45RA+CD31+ T Cells Correlate with First Diagnosis of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

期刊

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 250-258

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.11.010

关键词

Chronic graft-versus-host disease; Biomarker; B cells

资金

  1. European Commission Grant CELLEUROPE FP7-PEOPLE-ITN [315963]
  2. Austrotransplant
  3. German Sander Foundation
  4. Jose Carreras Foundation (Deutsche JoseCarreras Leukaemie-Stiftung) [DJCLS R 11709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a serious and frequent complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Currently, no biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of cGVHD are available. We performed a large prospective study focusing on noninvasive biomarkers for National Institutes of Health-defined cGVHD patients (n = 163) in comparison to time-matched HCT recipients who never experienced cGVHD (n = 64), analyzed from day 100 after HCT. In logistic regression analysis, CD19(+)CD21(low) B cells (P = .002; hazard ratio [HR.], 3.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53 to 7.17) and CD4(+)CD45RA(+)CD31(+) T cells (P < .001; HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.88 to 7.99) assessed on day 100 after HCT were significantly associated with subsequent development of cGVHD, independent of clinical parameters. A significant association with diagnosis of cGVHD was only observed for CD19(+)CD21(low) B cells (P = .008; HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.33 to 6.75) and CD4(+)CD45RA(+)CD31(+) T cells (P = .017; HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.19 to 6.55). CD19(+)CD21(low) B cells were found to have the highest discriminatory value with an area under the receiver operating curve of .77 (95% CI, .64 to .90). Our results demonstrate that CD19(+)CD21(low) B cells and CD4(+)CD45RA(+)CD31(+) T cells are significantly elevated in patients with newly diagnosed cGVHD. (C) 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据