4.2 Article

Outcome of drug-induced sleep endoscopy-directed surgery for persistent obstructive sleep apnea after adenotonsillar surgery

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.004

关键词

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy; Paediatric obstructive sleep apnea; Persistent obstructive sleep apnea; Adenotonsillar hypertrophy; Adenotonsillar surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is suitable for evaluating persistent obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) after adenotonsillar surgery as a means to guide surgical intervention, yet few studies demonstrate its usefulness in resolving the syndrome. We describe our experience of DISE-directed surgery in children with persistent OSAS by analysing objective and subjective outcomes of this treatment. Methods: Prospective study of 20 otherwise healthy 2-12 year-old children with OSAS persisting after adenotonsillar surgery. All patients underwent DISE-directed surgery and were followed up clinically and with a polysomnogram at 12 +/- 3 months. Results: All 20 children had an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) score >= 1 (mean: 6.1 +/- 4.9) and 75% had AHI > 3 before surgery. We performed a total of 14 total tonsillectomies (70%), 7 with associated pharyngoplasties; 5 radiofrequency turbinate reductions (25%); 7 radiofrequency lingual tonsil reductions (35%); and 10 revision adenoidectomies (50%). No surgery-related complications were observed. AHI scores at follow-up were significantly lower than AHI scores before surgery (1.895 +/- 1.11 vs 6.143 +/- 4.88; p < 0.05) and, in 85% (n = 17) of patients, AHI was below 3. There was a significant reduction in the number of children with AHI > 3 in follow-up at 12 +/- 3 months (15%; n = 3) compared to before surgery (75%; n = 15) (p < 0.005). Conclusion: DISE-directed surgery for otherwise healthy children with persistent OSAS is a useful and safe technique to decide a therapeutic strategy and to obtain good objective and subjective results regarding resolution of the syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据