4.7 Article

Long-lasting bactericidal activity through selective physical puncture and controlled ions release of polydopamine and silver nanoparticles-loaded TiO2 nanorods in vitro and in vivo

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 2903-2914

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S202625

关键词

bacterial infection; polydopamine; silver nanoparticles; physical puncture; TiO2 nanorods; bactericidal activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571816, 81601611]
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Titanium (Ti) implant-associated infection, which is mostly caused by bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, may result in implant failure and secondary surgery. Thus it is an urgent issue to prevent bacterial infections at the earliest step. Purpose: To develop a novel surface strategy of polydopamine (PDA) and silver (Ag) nanoparticle-loaded TiO2 nanorods (NRDs) coatings on Ti alloy. Materials and methods: Ag-TiO2@PDA NRDs was fabricated on Ti alloy by hydrothermal synthesis. The antibacterial activity of Ag-TiO2@PDA NRDs against Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were tested by FE-SEM, Live/Dead staining, zone of inhibition, bacteria counting method and protein leakage analysis in vitro. In addition, an implant infection model was conducted and the samples were tested by X-ray, Micro-CT and histological analysis in vivo. Besides, cell morphology and cytotoxicity of Mouse calvarial cells (MC3T3-E1) were characterized by FE-SEM, immunofluorescence and CCK-8 test in vitro. Results: Our study successfully developed a new surface coating of Ag-TiO2@PDA NRDs. The selective physical puncture of bacteria and controlled release of Ag+ ions of Ag-TiO2@PDA NRDs achieved a long-lasting bactericidal ability and anti-biofilm activity with satisfied biocompatibility. Conclusion: This strategy may be promising for clinical applications to reduce the occurrence of infection in the implant surgeries

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据